Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 21:47:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B012917B4F46190E53EBD6C334312F952E3BB55E563C3241AF2CF67702E61977
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no actual evidence it came from a Chinese lab. https://www.reuters.com/world/no-direct-evidence-covid-19-pandemic-started-wuhan-lab-us-intelligence-report-2023-06-24/ https://www.factcheck.org/misconceptions/the-origins-of-covid-19/ https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-still-no-determination-on-covid-19-origin/ https://apnews.com/article/archive-fact-checking-9391149002

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1851405907768365423
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B012917B4F46190E53EBD6C334312F952E3BB55E563C3241AF2CF67702E61977
createdAtMillis - 1730324866433
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1851405907768365423B012917B4F46190E53EBD6C334312F952E3BB55E563C3241AF2CF67702E61977