Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 12:26:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41689F88032B45B8566D537B56EADB9C622ED11C98A9DC34D725FD285CC3D33B
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no actual evidence it came from a Chinese lab. https://www.reuters.com/world/no-direct-evidence-covid-19-pandemic-started-wuhan-lab-us-intelligence-report-2023-06-24/ https://www.factcheck.org/misconceptions/the-origins-of-covid-19/ https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-still-no-determination-on-covid-19-origin/ https://apnews.com/article/archive-fact-checking-9391149002

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1851405907768365423
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 41689F88032B45B8566D537B56EADB9C622ED11C98A9DC34D725FD285CC3D33B
createdAtMillis - 1730291167105
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 185140590776836542341689F88032B45B8566D537B56EADB9C622ED11C98A9DC34D725FD285CC3D33B