Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-29 17:48:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AD724DF2F26DE8E8B657C9A56600F78DD7993808114C3A19AC0CDE28E764F52
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Según anunció en su día Íñigo Errejón, en Sumar tenían por norma no responder a Vito Quiles: https://x.com/vitoquiles/status/1833592255237755044 Si tras su marcha, Sumar sigue manteniendo la misma norma anunciada por Errejón y no se le da la opción de preguntar a Vito Quiles, el post no necesita ningún contexto adicional.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851167747037680106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AD724DF2F26DE8E8B657C9A56600F78DD7993808114C3A19AC0CDE28E764F52
  • createdAtMillis - 1730224096811
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18511677470376801066AD724DF2F26DE8E8B657C9A56600F78DD7993808114C3A19AC0CDE28E764F52