Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 04:02:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA4D9EE7593631C1C4F72213F4F6A079F58BA30FEFFC0A9D09C931A956B8A87C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- the 1st statement in the post was regarding the facts on the court ruling. https://nevadacurrent.com/briefs/nv-supreme-court-upholds-ruling-on-mail-ballots-received-post-election-day/ The last statement was the posters opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851152662412292261
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA4D9EE7593631C1C4F72213F4F6A079F58BA30FEFFC0A9D09C931A956B8A87C
  • createdAtMillis - 1730260949653
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851152662412292261CA4D9EE7593631C1C4F72213F4F6A079F58BA30FEFFC0A9D09C931A956B8A87C