Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-29 12:26:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE8088E6148D8C9884120B989A40EC044214FE043A955E115F2A5F72202194DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. The Nevada Supreme Court did not rule in a vacuum. The petitioners, RNC, failed to prove the merits of its appeal or demonstrate irreparable harm by showing that the 24 ballots RNC cited had any partisan lean towards Democrats or that they altered the outcome. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2024-10-28-Order-WM.pdf https://nevadacurrent.com/briefs/nv-supreme-court-upholds-ruling-on-mail-ballots-received-post-election-day/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851113233538789841
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE8088E6148D8C9884120B989A40EC044214FE043A955E115F2A5F72202194DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1730204800615
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1851113233538789841BE8088E6148D8C9884120B989A40EC044214FE043A955E115F2A5F72202194DF