Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 17:28:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5614EBA5386AA534D2E982EC84146821FEBF947084FA80A3819F5FB1A8EC41F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading. The Nevada Supreme Court did not rule in a vacuum. The petitioners, RNC, failed to prove the merits of its appeal or demonstrate irreparable harm by showing that the 24 ballots RNC cited had any partisan lean towards Democrats or that they altered the outcome. https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2024-10-28-Order-WM.pdf https://nevadacurrent.com/briefs/nv-supreme-court-upholds-ruling-on-mail-ballots-received-post-election-day/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851113233538789841
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5614EBA5386AA534D2E982EC84146821FEBF947084FA80A3819F5FB1A8EC41F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1730309316894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18511132335387898415614EBA5386AA534D2E982EC84146821FEBF947084FA80A3819F5FB1A8EC41F6