Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-29 17:59:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B8D5F66E2A6A46EA5267E4BA829A97A25ACB885241731B5F6FBBEA3B1C0FB5C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post is not misleading without the suggested context as it expresses the opinion of the British government. Argument against that opinon, on this website at least, would seem best done in the replies or QTs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851050444027498965
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B8D5F66E2A6A46EA5267E4BA829A97A25ACB885241731B5F6FBBEA3B1C0FB5C
  • createdAtMillis - 1730224744679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18510504440274989657B8D5F66E2A6A46EA5267E4BA829A97A25ACB885241731B5F6FBBEA3B1C0FB5C