Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-29 11:11:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D6CDD08AF76C9C786D457B1698AD7B000690892F9B586D64CE888B94BEFDEE4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post is not misleading without the suggested context as it expresses the opinion of the British government. Argument against that opinon, on this website at least, would seem best done in the replies or QTs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851050444027498965
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D6CDD08AF76C9C786D457B1698AD7B000690892F9B586D64CE888B94BEFDEE4
  • createdAtMillis - 1730200314520
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18510504440274989656D6CDD08AF76C9C786D457B1698AD7B000690892F9B586D64CE888B94BEFDEE4