Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-29 21:17:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55898BA24F65CD6892847C37F857435B40480D9511148C41FC976FCA9B5D1CD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post is not misleading without the suggested context as it expresses the opinion of the British government. Argument against that opinon, on this website at least, would seem best done in the replies or QTs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851050444027498965
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55898BA24F65CD6892847C37F857435B40480D9511148C41FC976FCA9B5D1CD9
  • createdAtMillis - 1730236656938
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185105044402749896555898BA24F65CD6892847C37F857435B40480D9511148C41FC976FCA9B5D1CD9