Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 00:09:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98523D89B292C4721F8676B8FF5FC10104BDAC94BAF53505FCC52E5F1DEE2827
Participant Details

Original Note:

Polskie prawo wyraźnie mówi, że do wyroku sądu osoba oskarżana jest niewinna. Autorka postu w pełni świadomie pomawia niewinnego w świetle prawa człowieka, lub nie zna postaw polskiego systemu prawnego. https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/kodeks-postepowania-karnego-16798685/art-5

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851015862918222123
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98523D89B292C4721F8676B8FF5FC10104BDAC94BAF53505FCC52E5F1DEE2827
  • createdAtMillis - 1730246983699
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185101586291822212398523D89B292C4721F8676B8FF5FC10104BDAC94BAF53505FCC52E5F1DEE2827