Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-28 07:45:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 745E88589E7DB2CDEAD105F761AA947D57E2CB54201F4368C1985A07D6D98D13
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. OP is expressing a personal opinion. Further, The Cato Institute is a public policy group; not an authoritative source. Finally the article itself indicates it's commentary, not factual so it does not meet Community Note standards. https://www.cato.org/about https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1850736562310627435
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 745E88589E7DB2CDEAD105F761AA947D57E2CB54201F4368C1985A07D6D98D13
  • createdAtMillis - 1730101553487
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1850736562310627435745E88589E7DB2CDEAD105F761AA947D57E2CB54201F4368C1985A07D6D98D13