Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-28 12:00:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5966FAE78D43D06D7EF94FB372D12E6714314150832B6476E736CF947DAC8B2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN CN uses Wikipedia as sourcing. Volunteers update the site making it open to bias and inaccuracies. Wikipedia is not considered serious sourcing material and should not be used as a sole resource. https://opentext.ku.edu/becredible/chapter/wikipedia/ https://www.reputationsciences.com/top-wikipedia-alternatives/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1850605951424114705
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5966FAE78D43D06D7EF94FB372D12E6714314150832B6476E736CF947DAC8B2D
createdAtMillis - 1730116852630
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18506059514241147055966FAE78D43D06D7EF94FB372D12E6714314150832B6476E736CF947DAC8B2D