Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-28 09:28:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48D1851EBD7AB9D358823A140B45EE6531AD094C6DC5D3211E8F80753F3E7221
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN CN uses Wikipedia as sourcing. Volunteers update the site making it open to bias and inaccuracies. Wikipedia is not considered serious sourcing material and should not be used as a sole resource. https://opentext.ku.edu/becredible/chapter/wikipedia/ https://www.reputationsciences.com/top-wikipedia-alternatives/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1850605951424114705
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 48D1851EBD7AB9D358823A140B45EE6531AD094C6DC5D3211E8F80753F3E7221
createdAtMillis - 1730107704087
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 185060595142411470548D1851EBD7AB9D358823A140B45EE6531AD094C6DC5D3211E8F80753F3E7221