Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-28 10:31:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F93E4DF780FC52AD19BE4781DA8255359FA6E09EB3221EF7E4336639C1B0E9B9
Participant Details
Original Note:
Les "découvertes" de McKernan, non validées par les pairs, font débat scientifique. Certains tentent de reproduire ses résultats, mais la FDA + l'Institut Paul-Ehrlich rejettent ses affirmations, évoquant un manque de transparence & de validation dans ses méthodes. https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/still-no-evidence-covid-19-vaccination-increases-cancer-risk-despite-posts/ https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/feb/08/facebook-posts/oft-repeated-claim-again-debunked-experts-say-stil/ https://kleanindustries.com/resources/market-analysis-research/exclusive-health-canada-confirms-undisclosed-presence-dna-sequence-pfizer-shot/ https://www.medecinesciences.org/en/articles/medsci/full_html/2003/01/medsci2003191p5/medsci2003191p5.html https://science.feedback.org/review/claim-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-dna-contaminants-study-unknown-provenance-no-evidence-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-alter-dna-people/ https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/newsroom-en/notification/231222-testing-mrna-vaccinas-dna-contamination.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3
All Note Details