Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-28 13:52:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85F9C4AAA0E112514B3DDDBBB58F3E243C35D65E32F191F6E9657F7DFD53EE25
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Le post exprime une opinion. Même si les SHS au CNRS ne coûtaient que 18M€/an (ce qui est faux, car ce chiffre est hors masse salariale), le Figaro pourrait toujours trouver que c'est "très cher" subjectivement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1850475240335507505
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85F9C4AAA0E112514B3DDDBBB58F3E243C35D65E32F191F6E9657F7DFD53EE25
  • createdAtMillis - 1730123563553
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185047524033550750585F9C4AAA0E112514B3DDDBBB58F3E243C35D65E32F191F6E9657F7DFD53EE25