Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-27 10:19:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4120477FB620D758433FA9A343C1ED760C4B8E4A25A5A5E3F37D507BA32D2A2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Le post exprime une opinion. Même si les SHS au CNRS ne coûtaient que 18M€/an (ce qui est faux, car ce chiffre est hors masse salariale), le Figaro pourrait toujours trouver que c'est "très cher" subjectivement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1850475240335507505
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4120477FB620D758433FA9A343C1ED760C4B8E4A25A5A5E3F37D507BA32D2A2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1730024364270
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18504752403355075054120477FB620D758433FA9A343C1ED760C4B8E4A25A5A5E3F37D507BA32D2A2B