Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-28 00:56:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60CD79289A956BCA133214C4242B38C3571F00C0C8375DA90ECAF5F9F61FB70D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Dissertations could be written on this subject. Too complex for community note and this is a pretty fair claim. Ginsberg had many thoughts and some were that Roe was too sweeping and fine without input from state legislatures. https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-offers-critique-roe-v-wade-during-law-school-visit

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1850394683803111913
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 60CD79289A956BCA133214C4242B38C3571F00C0C8375DA90ECAF5F9F61FB70D
createdAtMillis - 1730076962458
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 185039468380311191360CD79289A956BCA133214C4242B38C3571F00C0C8375DA90ECAF5F9F61FB70D