Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 03:53:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F950978834E8B4F8AE01703D591684BE52941719D19FCF3D1230557B1A0D7AB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Appellate Court made no findings. It simply consolidated Lanez's petition with the pending appeal and prior habeas corpus petition, meaning all will be heard together. The State's response is due by Nov. 20, and Lanez's reply 15 days later. The claim is blatantly false. https://www.vibe.com/news/entertainment/tory-lanez-case-new-evidence-rejected-by-attorney-general-1234901551/ https://www.legalaffairsandtrials.com/p/state-says-tory-lanez-knew-how-his

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849963219063914612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F950978834E8B4F8AE01703D591684BE52941719D19FCF3D1230557B1A0D7AB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1729914784438
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849963219063914612F950978834E8B4F8AE01703D591684BE52941719D19FCF3D1230557B1A0D7AB9