Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 03:55:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9C264FE23E2889E35940CF2C582A06EEFE364EB109C7FC9C2FC1A0F8AB50DCE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Appellate Court made no findings. It simply consolidated Lanez's petition with the pending appeal and prior habeas corpus petition, meaning all will be heard together. The State's response is due by Nov. 20, and Lanez's reply 15 days later. The claim is blatantly false. https://www.vibe.com/news/entertainment/tory-lanez-case-new-evidence-rejected-by-attorney-general-1234901551/ https://www.legalaffairsandtrials.com/p/state-says-tory-lanez-knew-how-his

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849963219063914612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9C264FE23E2889E35940CF2C582A06EEFE364EB109C7FC9C2FC1A0F8AB50DCE
  • createdAtMillis - 1729914954905
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849963219063914612A9C264FE23E2889E35940CF2C582A06EEFE364EB109C7FC9C2FC1A0F8AB50DCE