Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 00:15:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55B88CA2E1F8060F29020C23C46450A36342C10B278DDD3E9F575C32CC0746D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Appellate Court made no findings. It simply consolidated Lanez's petition with the pending appeal and prior habeas corpus petition, meaning all will be heard together. The State's response is due by Nov. 20, and Lanez's reply 15 days later. The claim is blatantly false. https://www.vibe.com/news/entertainment/tory-lanez-case-new-evidence-rejected-by-attorney-general-1234901551/ https://www.legalaffairsandtrials.com/p/state-says-tory-lanez-knew-how-his

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849963219063914612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55B88CA2E1F8060F29020C23C46450A36342C10B278DDD3E9F575C32CC0746D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1729901735323
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184996321906391461255B88CA2E1F8060F29020C23C46450A36342C10B278DDD3E9F575C32CC0746D4