Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 03:39:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2310FDF8A491F204C03B91C7617272E22439B537324E28DB4261568C3588D687
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Appellate Court made no findings. It simply consolidated Lanez's petition with the pending appeal and prior habeas corpus petition, meaning all will be heard together. The State's response is due by Nov. 20, and Lanez's reply 15 days later. The claim is blatantly false. https://www.vibe.com/news/entertainment/tory-lanez-case-new-evidence-rejected-by-attorney-general-1234901551/ https://www.legalaffairsandtrials.com/p/state-says-tory-lanez-knew-how-his

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849963219063914612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2310FDF8A491F204C03B91C7617272E22439B537324E28DB4261568C3588D687
  • createdAtMillis - 1729913991306
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18499632190639146122310FDF8A491F204C03B91C7617272E22439B537324E28DB4261568C3588D687