Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-28 13:19:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD6D7886FC89195EE42809F0A10075DA95DF13E5E4A62D74DFF5602726FC73EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. The reason why he was asked to remove it adds context. For those of you arguing Revised Code 3501.35 doesn't mention MAGA, it specifically singles it out as campaign attire (and thus prohibited) in the last sentence of the first paragraph. https://www.boe.ohio.gov/ashland/c/pdf/CampaigningPoliticalAttireGuidance.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849931093702496287
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD6D7886FC89195EE42809F0A10075DA95DF13E5E4A62D74DFF5602726FC73EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1730121558282
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849931093702496287FD6D7886FC89195EE42809F0A10075DA95DF13E5E4A62D74DFF5602726FC73EF