Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 14:57:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4252EB83178770214AF955B3A6208017F954F09E55722B8AAFD4288DBA7AFA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. The reason why he was asked to remove it adds context. For those of you arguing Revised Code 3501.35 doesn't mention MAGA, it specifically singles it out as campaign attire (and thus prohibited) in the last sentence of the first paragraph. https://www.boe.ohio.gov/ashland/c/pdf/CampaigningPoliticalAttireGuidance.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849931093702496287
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4252EB83178770214AF955B3A6208017F954F09E55722B8AAFD4288DBA7AFA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1729954674294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1849931093702496287D4252EB83178770214AF955B3A6208017F954F09E55722B8AAFD4288DBA7AFA1