Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 10:11:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B15290C8EB062A25A4DAE6FB09A32AD7130FA1B068342AF898E53EC46CEA7470
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. The reason why he was asked to remove it adds context. For those of you arguing Revised Code 3501.35 doesn't mention MAGA, it specifically singles it out as campaign attire (and thus prohibited) in the last sentence of the first paragraph. https://www.boe.ohio.gov/ashland/c/pdf/CampaigningPoliticalAttireGuidance.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849931093702496287
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B15290C8EB062A25A4DAE6FB09A32AD7130FA1B068342AF898E53EC46CEA7470
  • createdAtMillis - 1729937464556
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849931093702496287B15290C8EB062A25A4DAE6FB09A32AD7130FA1B068342AF898E53EC46CEA7470