Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 22:07:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EA4B728B671BDF5467167D5C9540B949D584B420ECD8512876249737A1E8D35
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. The reason why he was asked to remove it adds context. For those of you arguing Revised Code 3501.35 doesn't mention MAGA, it specifically singles it out as campaign attire (and thus prohibited) in the last sentence of the first paragraph. https://www.boe.ohio.gov/ashland/c/pdf/CampaigningPoliticalAttireGuidance.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849931093702496287
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EA4B728B671BDF5467167D5C9540B949D584B420ECD8512876249737A1E8D35
  • createdAtMillis - 1729894069091
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18499310937024962874EA4B728B671BDF5467167D5C9540B949D584B420ECD8512876249737A1E8D35