Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 02:15:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FAE237BFF381AA041AA80FF7E424B6CC2E6E2595CC64AE208D9D81E8252A1726
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. A nota anterior possui viés totalmente ideológico. Ora, alegar que há "prova concreta" em uma ação sem trânsito julgado é tão medíocre quanto o tweet que contesta a ação policial.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849843398003290395
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FAE237BFF381AA041AA80FF7E424B6CC2E6E2595CC64AE208D9D81E8252A1726
  • createdAtMillis - 1729908956571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849843398003290395FAE237BFF381AA041AA80FF7E424B6CC2E6E2595CC64AE208D9D81E8252A1726