Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 22:15:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FF70E053476711E445A6696F4E71A0E9E694EB989AA6C0D154F10ACE6CC47FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. A nota anterior possui viés totalmente ideológico. Ora, alegar que há "prova concreta" em uma ação sem trânsito julgado é tão medíocre quanto o tweet que contesta a ação policial.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849842419992318185
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FF70E053476711E445A6696F4E71A0E9E694EB989AA6C0D154F10ACE6CC47FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1729894538740
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18498424199923181853FF70E053476711E445A6696F4E71A0E9E694EB989AA6C0D154F10ACE6CC47FC