Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 19:59:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA1311C9558E7A4D7E996AE70B09F66ECCFDA4EC66F04DACB24E816AE0D2EC78
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zelfs de genoemde berekeningen van de Haas en Lucassen kloppen niet, laat staan de gehele analyse. https://x.com/demo_demo_nl/status/1849468462801821963?s=46&t=qt5KAU_q9lKZIZJ9pfADSg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849587605467279392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA1311C9558E7A4D7E996AE70B09F66ECCFDA4EC66F04DACB24E816AE0D2EC78
  • createdAtMillis - 1729886383728
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849587605467279392FA1311C9558E7A4D7E996AE70B09F66ECCFDA4EC66F04DACB24E816AE0D2EC78