Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 06:51:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA9D58797AB14B39FF1EBD94CC50C9F47778E5234C9628497B54BDAE26EB5529
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zelfs de genoemde berekeningen van de Haas en Lucassen kloppen niet, laat staan de gehele analyse. https://x.com/demo_demo_nl/status/1849468462801821963?s=46&t=qt5KAU_q9lKZIZJ9pfADSg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849587605467279392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA9D58797AB14B39FF1EBD94CC50C9F47778E5234C9628497B54BDAE26EB5529
  • createdAtMillis - 1729839068442
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1849587605467279392DA9D58797AB14B39FF1EBD94CC50C9F47778E5234C9628497B54BDAE26EB5529