Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 04:43:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 34751D643E40F4C152239A637C97F9FC0337B137ED712ECBD44885A79B15A2E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zelfs de genoemde berekeningen van de Haas en Lucassen kloppen niet, laat staan de gehele analyse. https://x.com/demo_demo_nl/status/1849468462801821963?s=46&t=qt5KAU_q9lKZIZJ9pfADSg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849587605467279392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 34751D643E40F4C152239A637C97F9FC0337B137ED712ECBD44885A79B15A2E7
  • createdAtMillis - 1729831392480
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 184958760546727939234751D643E40F4C152239A637C97F9FC0337B137ED712ECBD44885A79B15A2E7