Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 00:53:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9A9F4561576CA0526DE8BD2269758032E6630E144D987D7C1015753D7491DA2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author clearly states that ..."someone [once] argued"... An arguement is not a statement of fact, and there's nothing to be 'corrected' here. The author is stating an opinion. Any counter arguement should be taken to the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849566678012833848
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9A9F4561576CA0526DE8BD2269758032E6630E144D987D7C1015753D7491DA2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1729817623757
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18495666780128338489A9F4561576CA0526DE8BD2269758032E6630E144D987D7C1015753D7491DA2B