Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 06:42:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 272F02A61589CF2B2B4DC0FF4C2E01CA1938FDC0C71872EE2E5093A8F3D32623
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author clearly states that ..."someone [once] argued"... An arguement is not a statement of fact, and there's nothing to be 'corrected' here. The author is stating an opinion. Any counter arguement should be taken to the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849566678012833848
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 272F02A61589CF2B2B4DC0FF4C2E01CA1938FDC0C71872EE2E5093A8F3D32623
  • createdAtMillis - 1729838571565
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849566678012833848272F02A61589CF2B2B4DC0FF4C2E01CA1938FDC0C71872EE2E5093A8F3D32623