Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 05:43:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 23E75AB8B2A80DAF91F95E3772859F448C2066C924B5E15828A9A87A3E3D218F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author clearly states that ..."someone [once] argued"... An arguement is not a statement of fact, and there's nothing to be 'corrected' here. The author is stating an opinion. Any counter arguement should be taken to the comments, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849566678012833848
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 23E75AB8B2A80DAF91F95E3772859F448C2066C924B5E15828A9A87A3E3D218F
  • createdAtMillis - 1729834989187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184956667801283384823E75AB8B2A80DAF91F95E3772859F448C2066C924B5E15828A9A87A3E3D218F