Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 06:19:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDA9E92942BE65E523E49211CF639AC50148749D355CC553F99395D0CD69A3DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The person above refuses to share how they “detected” their students’ use of AI. As of date, unless caught within the act, there is no reliable way to detect AI use as AI checkers are inaccurate and prone to false positives. https://themarkup.org/machine-learning/2023/08/14/ai-detection-tools-falsely-accuse-international-students-of-cheating

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849532113487544482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FDA9E92942BE65E523E49211CF639AC50148749D355CC553F99395D0CD69A3DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1729837175095
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1849532113487544482FDA9E92942BE65E523E49211CF639AC50148749D355CC553F99395D0CD69A3DE