Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 21:55:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AEBFD35619B9578125853B119B8429498A0B26D0528AFEBA0848908844FEB4A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The person above refuses to share how they “detected” their students’ use of AI. As of date, unless caught within the act, there is no reliable way to detect AI use as AI checkers are inaccurate and prone to false positives. https://themarkup.org/machine-learning/2023/08/14/ai-detection-tools-falsely-accuse-international-students-of-cheating

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849532113487544482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AEBFD35619B9578125853B119B8429498A0B26D0528AFEBA0848908844FEB4A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1729806941628
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1849532113487544482AEBFD35619B9578125853B119B8429498A0B26D0528AFEBA0848908844FEB4A8