Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 21:50:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ACC106E9D927412AE406FA9BFCE371C346D92D14FDA619291A7AE8FBBEDF835A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The person above refuses to share how they “detected” their students’ use of AI. As of date, unless caught within the act, there is no reliable way to detect AI use as AI checkers are inaccurate and prone to false positives. https://themarkup.org/machine-learning/2023/08/14/ai-detection-tools-falsely-accuse-international-students-of-cheating

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849532113487544482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ACC106E9D927412AE406FA9BFCE371C346D92D14FDA619291A7AE8FBBEDF835A
  • createdAtMillis - 1729806651310
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1849532113487544482ACC106E9D927412AE406FA9BFCE371C346D92D14FDA619291A7AE8FBBEDF835A