Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 22:38:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DB2951D06638EBD940B85C61FD9E67C3533903F009074073FC889200D6B07CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The person above refuses to share how they “detected” their students’ use of AI. As of date, unless caught within the act, there is no reliable way to detect AI use as AI checkers are inaccurate and prone to false positives. https://themarkup.org/machine-learning/2023/08/14/ai-detection-tools-falsely-accuse-international-students-of-cheating

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849532113487544482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9DB2951D06638EBD940B85C61FD9E67C3533903F009074073FC889200D6B07CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1729809502191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18495321134875444829DB2951D06638EBD940B85C61FD9E67C3533903F009074073FC889200D6B07CD