Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 21:09:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F58F355817C190979A9EBDC62E65E917144C7179AD6971A9FB3099CD8929F8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The person above refuses to share how they “detected” their students’ use of AI. As of date, unless caught within the act, there is no reliable way to detect AI use as AI checkers are inaccurate and prone to false positives. https://themarkup.org/machine-learning/2023/08/14/ai-detection-tools-falsely-accuse-international-students-of-cheating

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849532113487544482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F58F355817C190979A9EBDC62E65E917144C7179AD6971A9FB3099CD8929F8E
  • createdAtMillis - 1729804177136
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18495321134875444821F58F355817C190979A9EBDC62E65E917144C7179AD6971A9FB3099CD8929F8E