Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 17:49:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet gets the dollar amount factually correct, and OP does not even argue that the campaign should have spent the funds on disaster relief. The proposed note is utterly pointless. There's no reason why it can't just be a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849494815123107932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5
  • createdAtMillis - 1729792158583
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849494815123107932F835DDDD6FB4FFE3B2DAA2DD5E5A362AA8AFD3E62D99922A3A8463F224A86ED5