Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 10:35:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B00B1AD50691CA4F4D8CC0925637D5F55AF66D3299E765E3AE95D9140EB67DC0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet gets the dollar amount factually correct, and OP does not even argue that the campaign should have spent the funds on disaster relief. The proposed note is utterly pointless. There's no reason why it can't just be a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849494815123107932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B00B1AD50691CA4F4D8CC0925637D5F55AF66D3299E765E3AE95D9140EB67DC0
  • createdAtMillis - 1729852539383
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849494815123107932B00B1AD50691CA4F4D8CC0925637D5F55AF66D3299E765E3AE95D9140EB67DC0