Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 05:39:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96F439E367BB1EF141844F4CBD69132E4FAC6D5E0E8E592A3612692D63B07B3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet gets the dollar amount factually correct, and OP does not even argue that the campaign should have spent the funds on disaster relief. The proposed note is utterly pointless. There's no reason why it can't just be a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849494815123107932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96F439E367BB1EF141844F4CBD69132E4FAC6D5E0E8E592A3612692D63B07B3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1729921143932
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184949481512310793296F439E367BB1EF141844F4CBD69132E4FAC6D5E0E8E592A3612692D63B07B3A