Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 23:11:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AE17CA44C05AC3C0D42AC91BAC9E76084A29A041B9DD8534BEDDEF93C3CC910
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet gets the dollar amount factually correct, and OP does not even argue that the campaign should have spent the funds on disaster relief. The proposed note is utterly pointless. There's no reason why it can't just be a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849494815123107932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1AE17CA44C05AC3C0D42AC91BAC9E76084A29A041B9DD8534BEDDEF93C3CC910
  • createdAtMillis - 1729811477227
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18494948151231079321AE17CA44C05AC3C0D42AC91BAC9E76084A29A041B9DD8534BEDDEF93C3CC910