Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 01:00:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 120CD6C5673018EEE2F523071C4B6205E001B09D39887134C03746E8E5710681
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet gets the dollar amount factually correct, and OP does not even argue that the campaign should have spent the funds on disaster relief. The proposed note is utterly pointless. There's no reason why it can't just be a comment.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849494815123107932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 120CD6C5673018EEE2F523071C4B6205E001B09D39887134C03746E8E5710681
  • createdAtMillis - 1729818053185
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849494815123107932120CD6C5673018EEE2F523071C4B6205E001B09D39887134C03746E8E5710681