Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 11:48:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CED6491B9C00483A869CA30ADA89A70EDB9DCE5D24CC67340D7BB83D9962A8F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the fact that other studies from the grant were published, especially positive, only adds to OP's point about this study not being published

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849298526129230287
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CED6491B9C00483A869CA30ADA89A70EDB9DCE5D24CC67340D7BB83D9962A8F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1729770519095
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849298526129230287CED6491B9C00483A869CA30ADA89A70EDB9DCE5D24CC67340D7BB83D9962A8F6