Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 08:22:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B966EF1902C3A463F2E4EAD23144A1DEDC946DC1EEB7BE3ECCB90926B78C9CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Considering that NOAA scrubbed its own sites of this research it’s disingenuous at best. This information presented as fact is at best an opinion, one this agency seems to still debate. It’s a stifling of debate. https://x.com/legendrekristy/status/1843624398496117110?s=46&t=Q2W-6Jp1e54M6XvzawaF9Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849298225309602011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B966EF1902C3A463F2E4EAD23144A1DEDC946DC1EEB7BE3ECCB90926B78C9CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1729758146042
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18492982253096020118B966EF1902C3A463F2E4EAD23144A1DEDC946DC1EEB7BE3ECCB90926B78C9CC