Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 08:32:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 254DBDAE2450492A9ED854FC0313E1B208B401B7803C53652CE784A7A9D00F68
Participant Details

Original Note:

Considering that NOAA scrubbed its own sites of this research it’s disingenuous at best. This information presented as fact is at best an opinion, one this agency seems to still debate. It’s a stifling of debate. https://x.com/legendrekristy/status/1843624398496117110?s=46&t=Q2W-6Jp1e54M6XvzawaF9Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849298225309602011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 254DBDAE2450492A9ED854FC0313E1B208B401B7803C53652CE784A7A9D00F68
  • createdAtMillis - 1729758755068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1849298225309602011254DBDAE2450492A9ED854FC0313E1B208B401B7803C53652CE784A7A9D00F68