Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 03:00:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1A48DC6DB2DC9D192E6663992E9FDE3F88B1BEC905213D2F253E689AEB0B5F47
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the fact that other studies from the grant were published, especially positive, only adds to OP's point about this study not being published

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849283929821561047
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1A48DC6DB2DC9D192E6663992E9FDE3F88B1BEC905213D2F253E689AEB0B5F47
  • createdAtMillis - 1729738809585
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18492839298215610471A48DC6DB2DC9D192E6663992E9FDE3F88B1BEC905213D2F253E689AEB0B5F47