Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 03:07:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CA442C6A4A9C6EF321D3E08F3079DD8F5F7FAE9405453F65C56D44C4044AC61
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the fact that other studies from the grant were published, especially positive, only adds to OP's point about this study not being published

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849283929821561047
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CA442C6A4A9C6EF321D3E08F3079DD8F5F7FAE9405453F65C56D44C4044AC61
  • createdAtMillis - 1729739260791
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18492839298215610470CA442C6A4A9C6EF321D3E08F3079DD8F5F7FAE9405453F65C56D44C4044AC61