Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 04:07:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F187586A6295F1C9EFF6969AF358E027CE810E9F310D02103154AC5924C4B310
Participant Details

Original Note:

公認と非公認の違いは公認料の有無だけではないことに留意が必要です. https://mainichi.jp/articles/20241017/k00/00m/010/025000c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849255200051400786
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F187586A6295F1C9EFF6969AF358E027CE810E9F310D02103154AC5924C4B310
  • createdAtMillis - 1729742861332
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849255200051400786F187586A6295F1C9EFF6969AF358E027CE810E9F310D02103154AC5924C4B310