Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 07:12:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3F5C2B87D01878A3E003EB971F9F8E3F8227136B59A6162FDF30D44CF172933
Participant Details

Original Note:

公認と非公認の違いは公認料の有無だけではないことに留意が必要です. https://mainichi.jp/articles/20241017/k00/00m/010/025000c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849255200051400786
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3F5C2B87D01878A3E003EB971F9F8E3F8227136B59A6162FDF30D44CF172933
  • createdAtMillis - 1729753960321
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1849255200051400786E3F5C2B87D01878A3E003EB971F9F8E3F8227136B59A6162FDF30D44CF172933